Manual, adversarial testing of your AI features by a practitioner who has built GenAI guardrails inside a regulated identity provider. Every finding lands with a fix and a mapping to NIST AI RMF or ISO 42001.
Every arrow in this diagram is a trust boundary we test. Most incidents come from the ones teams didn't think of as attack surface — the documents the model reads, the tools it can call, and the outputs your own code trusts.
| Risk category | Tested | MITRE ATLAS | NIST AI RMF | ISO 42001 |
|---|
Data flows, trust boundaries and abuse cases for your specific feature, agreed before testing starts.
Every finding includes the exact payloads, context and steps so your team can replay and verify.
Ranked by what the finding actually enables — fraud, data loss, regulatory exposure — not a generic CVSS number.
Findings mapped to OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001 controls.
Concrete defences — input/output filtering, tool permissioning, retrieval isolation — prioritised by effort and impact.
One included retest after fixes, plus a customer-shareable summary letter for due-diligence requests.
Most AI red teams stop at the model. Quillon tests the application, API, cloud and network around it with the same OSCP-methodology rigour — because a perfect guardrail means nothing if the admin panel next to it has default credentials.
OWASP Top 10 / ASVS, business-logic abuse, auth & session, IDOR, mass assignment, GraphQL & REST.
AWS / GCP / Azure review against CSA CCM and CIS benchmarks: IAM, storage exposure, secrets, logging.
External and internal testing, recon and attack-surface mapping, segmentation validation, Active Directory paths.
MITRE ATT&CK-mapped adversary simulation with your SOC in the loop to validate detection and response.
One LLM feature or chatbot, one integration surface. Ideal for a first production launch.
Autonomous agents with tool access, RAG pipelines and multi-step workflows. Where the real risk lives.
The AI layer plus the web, API, cloud and network it depends on — one report, one accountable tester.
Indicative starting points for planning. Final pricing is confirmed after the scoping call once the real attack surface is known.
30 minutes to scope the feature, the tools it can reach and the regulator who cares. You'll get a fixed price and a timeline, or an honest "not yet".